This is the first in a series of imaginary letters from the founding fathers, speculating about the republic they could not see but somehow seemed to know. We begin where they began—with Hamilton’s opening argument, and his worry that we might not be wise enough to govern ourselves.
These letters are entirely imaginary—offered with wit, affection, irony, and no partisan agenda. We hope they make you smile, make you think, and perhaps send you back to what the founders actually wrote.
If this makes you think—or smile—please click “Like.” It helps these letters reach more readers who care about the republic the founders imagined.
Following the publication of Federalist No. 1, Hamilton writes to Madison speculating about the future of public deliberation in the republic.
New York, October 28, 1787
Dear Madison,
Having this morning dispatched my introductory number to the press, I find myself in a reflective—nay, apprehensive—humor. I have warned our countrymen that passion and prejudice shall attend this great debate, that interested men on every side will cloak ambition in the garments of patriotism, and that the loudest friends of liberty are sometimes its most dangerous enemies.
But suppose, my friend, that two centuries hence the means of publication have multiplied beyond our present imagination. Suppose every citizen possesses a printing press in his pocket, capable of dispatching his opinions to the multitude in an instant. Would not passion travel faster than reflection? Would not rumor circle the nation before truth had mounted its horse?
I confess I shudder at the thought. In such a world, the demagogue need not command an army or bribe a legislature—he need only inflame. Every man becomes his own pamphleteer, yet few pause to verify what they publish or to hear the reply. The art of deliberation, which requires time and patience, would wither in a hurricane of instantaneous accusation.
Perhaps I am too gloomy. But I cannot help fearing that the very instruments meant to enlighten might instead accelerate the passions I have warned against.
Your obedient servant, A. Hamilton
—
Philadelphia, November 10, 1787
Dear Hamilton,
Your speculation, though alarming, proceeds from sound premises. If publication requires no expense and suffers no delay, then the natural check upon intemperate speech—the interval between impulse and print—would vanish. Every passion would find its audience before reason could intervene.
I observe two dangers in such a circumstance. First, faction would not merely persist—it would calcify. When men receive only such intelligence as confirms their prejudices, delivered instantly and without contradiction, they will harden into tribes incapable of persuasion. Second, the very abundance of publication would breed not wisdom but exhaustion. Citizens overwhelmed by a flood of disputation may retreat from deliberation altogether, surrendering the field to the loudest and most persistent voices.
Yet I would not counsel despair. The remedy must lie in education—not merely in letters, but in the habits of scrutiny. If citizens are taught from youth to distrust their first impressions, to seek contrary evidence, and to suspect those who flatter their opinions, perhaps the instrument you fear might yet serve liberty.
The machine is not the disease. The disease, as ever, is in ourselves.
Your friend and servant, J. Madison
—
New York, November 22, 1787
Dear Madison,
You are, as usual, more hopeful than I. But I note this: you place your faith in education. I place mine in institutions. Let us pray posterity attends to both—for if they neglect either, your reasoning tribes and my inflamed demagogues will have the field to themselves.
Ever yours, Hamilton
If they only knew…
…that every citizen would one day carry a device capable of publishing to the world in an instant—and that passion would indeed travel faster than reflection. Hamilton feared that deliberation requires time. He could not have known how little time we would allow ourselves.
Questions for Reflection:
Hamilton feared that passion would travel faster than reflection. In your experience, does social media accelerate wisdom or inflame division—or both?
Madison placed his hope in education. Hamilton placed his in institutions. Which do you believe matters more for preserving the republic?
Share your thoughts in the comments—and if this made you think, please click “Like” to help these letters reach more readers.
—