Courage and Consequence – A One-Page Broadside That Triggered the State, and the New Republic Failed the Test

Jailed for criticizing the President! In 1799, Thomas Cooper published a single broadside criticizing President John Adams. The government prosecuted him under the Sedition Act, convicted him in a single day, and sentenced him to six months in federal prison — where his wife died. Cooper’s case is the clearest proof that the First Amendment, barely twelve years old, did not yet function as the guarantee Americans believed it to be. The new republic failed the test.

Read More…

Courage and Consequence – Elected from a Jail Cell

In 1798, a Federalist-controlled Congress jailed a sitting member of the House of Representatives for publishing an opinion critical of President John Adams. Matthew Lyon — veteran of the Green Mountain Boys, founder of Vermont communities, self-described “Ragged Matt the Democrat” — was convicted under the Sedition Act, sentenced to four months in a 16-by-12-foot cell, and fined $1,000. The administration expected the conviction to destroy him politically. Instead, Vermont re-elected him while he was still imprisoned. He returned to Congress, survived an expulsion vote, and two years later cast the tie-breaking ballot that sent Thomas Jefferson to the White House over Aaron Burr. This is the story of the speech case America forgot — with complete primary documents still preserved at the National Archives.

Read More…

If They Only Knew… When Speech Became Dangerous

What would the Founding Fathers think about governments suppressing speech in the name of national security? In 1798, just seven years after ratifying the First Amendment, Congress passed the Sedition Acts—making it a crime to criticize the government. President Adams signed them. Vice President Jefferson fought them. James Madison, the amendment’s own architect, had to explain what his words actually meant. In this episode of ‘If They Only Knew,’ three founders debate whether fear ever justifies silence, and whether the precedent they set will echo through centuries of future crises. Their question haunts us still: When does protecting the republic require silencing its critics—and when does silencing critics destroy the republic it claims to protect?

Read More…

The Logic of Seditious Behavior

Webster defines “sedition” as: “conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.” It’s pretty clear. But simply “talking about rebellion or overthrow” without encouraging violence may merely be expressing unsavory speech. The logic behind members of congress thus far is to speak out against what they consider to […]

Read More…

Sowing Disruptive Seeds – – Communicating Trash to Populate False Information to Draw Desired Conclusions!

What if someone wants his supporters to draw the conclusion that the election of another to high office is illegitimate. How should he proceed using the “Critical Skills?” I suppose he could do the following: Initiate lawsuits (legitimate or otherwise) challenging some part of the electoral process for inaccuracies, fraud, or whatever. It makes no […]

Read More…