This begins a new series of Courage and Consequence – The Ancient Witnesses.  Their decisions came before the Republic, before the Constitution, before the modern protections of law. Some are famous; their decisions are not. They stood before tyrants and tribunals with no precedent to guide them and no shelter to retreat to — and chose in the open. The courage of every figure that follows in this series rests on theirs.

Sima Qian needs to be remembered.

*   *   *   *   *

99 BCE. The Emperor offered him death or castration. He chose castration so he could finish the book.

There were three doors out of the prison in Chang’an.

The first was death by his own hand. That was the door an aristocrat walked through. A man of rank kept his honor by knowing when to die. He drank the cup or fell on the sword, and his family kept their name.

The second was a ransom. Five hundred thousand cash. Sima Qian could not raise it. His father had spent his life as a court astrologer and had left no fortune. No relative would risk the emperor’s anger to lend the money. The door was closed.

The third was castration.

He was forty-six. He had a daughter. He had a book. Eleven years earlier, at his father’s deathbed, he had promised to finish it.

He chose the third door.

His father’s name was Sima Tan. The Sima clan had served as court historians as far back as legend permitted. Sima Tan held the office of Grand Historian under Emperor Wu of the Han — astronomer, calendar-keeper, and clerk. On his own, he had conceived a larger project. A history of everything. From the legendary Yellow Emperor down to the present. No one had attempted it. He worked at it for years and produced only outlines.

In 110 BCE the emperor traveled to Mount Tai to perform the great sacrifices to Heaven and Earth. The Grand Historian’s office was supposed to attend such rites. Emperor Wu took someone else. Sima Tan fell ill at Zhounan and did not recover. His son was summoned from a military expedition in the southwest.

Sima Tan took his son’s hand at the end. He said, in substance: “You will become Grand Historian after me. Do not forget what I wished you to write.”

The son wept and promised.

In 99 BCE the emperor sent Li Guangli — his concubine’s brother, his favorite — to fight the Xiongnu with thirty thousand cavalry. Attached to the campaign, with five thousand infantry and no horses, was a young general named Li Ling.

Li Ling marched into the steppe. He encountered the main Xiongnu force, which outnumbered him by roughly eleven to one. He fought a running battle for eight days. He killed more Xiongnu than he had men. He retreated south under continuous fire, waiting for reinforcements. The reinforcements did not come. When his arrows were gone and his men were dying, he surrendered.

The news reached Chang’an. Emperor Wu was enraged. The court understood what the emperor wanted: condemnation of Li Ling, exoneration of Li Guangli. Officials lined up to denounce the captured general.

Sima Qian was the only one who did not.

He had not been close to Li Ling. He had no political stake. He had only what he had seen of the man at court — a careful, filial officer who had marched into the teeth of eighty thousand cavalry with five thousand foot soldiers and held them off for eight days. He said so. He said the surrender was not cowardice. It was the arithmetic of abandoned men.

Emperor Wu read the defense as a coded attack on Li Guangli, which is to say on himself. He had Sima Qian arrested. The charge was defaming the emperor. The sentence was death.

The Han code of honor was unambiguous. A man of his rank, given such a sentence, took his own life. Castration was the second of the Five Punishments, lower only than death. It was meant to be unacceptable. To accept it was to become a eunuch — outside the social register, mocked by clerks, cut off from the family ancestors a Confucian son was bound by inheritance to honor. The expected response was the rope or the cup.

He chose neither.

The procedure was administered in a heated cell called the silkworm chamber, kept warm to prevent infection. He served three years in prison. When he came out he was reassigned to the office of Palace Secretary — a position normally held by eunuchs and considered demeaning for a former Grand Historian. He held it for the rest of his life.

He had not yet finished the book.

Years later, near the end of his life, he wrote a letter to a friend named Ren An. Ren An was in a prison of his own, awaiting execution on charges arising from a witchcraft scandal at court. He had written to Sima Qian for help. Sima Qian could not help him. The two men had survived the same emperor in different ways and would not both survive him much longer.

The letter was Sima Qian’s accounting.

He did not present castration as the brave choice. He used the words shame, and filth, and second laughingstock. He said the lowest slave could find the courage to commit suicide. He said he knew the difference between what should be followed and what rejected. He had chosen the dishonorable thing. He had chosen it deliberately.

A man has one death, he wrote. That death may be as heavy as Mount Tai, or as light as a goose feather. It depends on the use he makes of it.

The line entered Chinese as a proverb and has not left it. Mount Tai is the sacred mountain at the eastern edge of the Han heartland. A goose feather is a goose feather.

He said his death by execution would have been the goose feather. He said the work was unfinished. He said he was ashamed to think his writings would not be known to posterity. He named a lineage — Confucius in distress, King Wen imprisoned, Qu Yuan banished, Sunzi with his feet cut off, Han Feizi held in a Qin cell — and placed himself among them. Men with a rankling in their hearts, who wrote of past affairs in order to pass on their thoughts to those not yet born.

He finished the book around 91 BCE. One hundred thirty chapters. More than five hundred thousand characters. Later editors named the whole work the Shiji — the Records of the Grand Historian.

He died, probably, around 86 BCE. The date is uncertain. The manner is uncertain. He may have been executed in connection with the same scandal that killed Ren An. He may have died quietly in obscurity. The record does not say.

The book survived because his daughter hid it.

Sima Qian had made two copies. One in the imperial archives. One at home. The home copy was kept by his daughter Sima Ying through the politically turbulent reign of Emperor Zhao, when an honest manuscript could have been destroyed. A generation later, her son — Sima Qian’s grandson, Yang Yun — brought the manuscript out in the more tolerant reign of Emperor Xuan. The Records of the Grand Historian entered the public record.

It became the founding work of Chinese historical writing. The five-part architecture Sima Qian invented — annals, tables, treatises, hereditary houses, biographies — became the standard form for every dynastic history compiled in China for the next two thousand years.

He had been right.

The choice he made in 98 BCE — to live in shame so that the work might survive — was the first complete written statement, in any civilization, of the principle that the record matters more than the recorder. He paid for it with his body, and he knew when he paid that the world would read his choice as cowardice. That his name would be linked, for as long as men remembered him, with the punishment of rottenness.

He paid anyway. The record survived.

Sima Qian needs to be remembered.

*   *   *   *   *

Sources: Sima Qian, Shiji, chapter 130 (the autobiographical postface, Taishigong zixu); Sima Qian, Letter to Ren An (Bao Ren An Shu), preserved in Ban Gu, Hanshu, chapter 62; Wm. Theodore de Bary and Irene Bloom, eds., Sources of Chinese Tradition, 2nd ed., vol. 1 (Columbia University Press, 1999); Stephen Durrant, Wai-yee Li, Michael Nylan, and Hans van Ess, The Letter to Ren An and Sima Qian’s Legacy (University of Washington Press, 2016); Burton Watson, trans., Records of the Grand Historian of China (Columbia University Press, revised editions); Asia for Educators, Columbia University, primary source DBQ with excerpted Letter to Ren An.

Next in this series: Socrates — He Argued with the Jury and Paid with His Life.

About the author: Charles C. Jett is a Naval Academy graduate, Harvard MBA, and Professional Certified Coach. He served as a U.S. Navy submarine officer during the Cold War, when his tactical tracking innovations were credited by the Secretary of the Navy for their strategic impact. He has spent four decades in consulting and civic education and is the author of six books. He writes at criticalskillsblog.com and civicsage.com, hosts the podcasts Making a Great America, The Jefferson-Adams Letters, and It’s All About Skills, and lives in Chicago.